The politics of Pluto
While it was interesting to see astronomy be front-page news for a few days, I can’t help but shake my head over the tribulations about the status of Pluto over the past few days. For what it’s worth, I think the IAU’s draft proposal that would have granted Pluto, Charon, and ‘Xena’ planet status was a valiant attempt to craft something that was reasonably objective…yet I also see the merit in its redesignation since it certainly seems a breed apart from the ‘official’ planets.
Yet, I wish the IAU had done a little more of this behind closed doors, announcing the final decision rather than the dramatic, back-and-forth of ‘yes, we think it is’ followed by ‘nah, never mind, it isn’t’ just a few days later. Granted, this is how science works: discussion, debate, and often decisions based on less than clear-cut criteria. However, many in the public expect that scientists have definitive answers–indeed, that a clear definition of planet had never been established was news enough to many people! This expectation is perhaps unjustified, but I’m mildly fearful that this recent squabble may muddy the waters and give further ammunition to those anti-scientific groups who already are showing a distressing amount of influence.
Hopefully it will all blow over. Besides, many will continue to look for Pluto, Ceres, and other dots in the sky no matter how the IAU decides to classify them.









